WIKILEAKS Reveals The NAMES Of Those Whom UHURU Has Approved To Be Paid BILLIONS Off ANGLO LEASING Are They His FRIENDS

In a classified file from the American embassy dated March 2,2006,the names behind controversial payment of Sh.1.3 billion recently approved by the president citing obligation and 'containing damage' have been revealed.

According to the exposing site,these are the people who will pocket the billions which has incited the opposition to plan a nationwide protest

◆Alfred Getonga,
◆Anura Perera,
◆Deepak Kamani,
◆Joseph "Jimmy" Wanjigi.

The cable goes further to give the sequence of how the fleecing was conducted

ANATOMY OF A CORRUPTION NETWORK
-------------------------------

3.  (C) In April 2004, information emerged publicly that a
shadowy firm, Anglo Leasing and Finance Limited (Anglo
Leasing), had secured two bogus contracts with the  Government of Kenya (GOK).  The first was for the supply of  new secure passport issuing equipment, and the second for
the construction of a police forensics lab.  Together, the  two contracts were worth a combined $90 million.  Anglo-
Leasing, it turned out, was no more than a "PO Box company"
with fictitious offices in the UK and Switzerland and no  identifiable officers or management. 

The Anglo-Leasing  scandal was aggressively investigated at the time by the  then-Permanent Secretary for Ethics and Governance, John
Githongo.  Githongo's investigations revealed Anglo-Leasing  to be only the tip of an iceberg of grand-scale theft.
They forced the Ministry of Finance to suspend payments and  order forensic audits on 18 secretive security-related
procurement contracts that followed a very similar pattern  to that found in the Anglo-Leasing cases.

4.  (C) This pattern involved a small clique of private-  sector dealmakers working together with an equally small
cadre of senior government conspirators.  Together, they
would generate proposals for large-scale government  procurement contracts.  Because these contracts involved  national security equipment of one kind or another, they
fell well outside the normal (and already weak) systems of
scrutiny and oversight found in other parts of the GOK and  Parliament.  The proposals  frequently requested goods not  needed or desired by the line ministry targeted to pay for
them, and involved large upfront payments or commissions
financed by loans arranged by the businessmen. 

The goods  or services were either vastly overpriced or not supplied
at all.  This kind of scam generated enormous illicit  profits, much of which were recycled by the businessmen who
received the payments to the concerned GOK officials and
other middlemen for personal gain or to finance future  political campaigns.

Adapted From Wikileaks